PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE


Bacterial Quorum- sensing Signal Molecules as Potential Inhibitors of Cytokine Storms in COVID-19



Ramakrishnan Sitaraman1, *
1 Department of Biotechnology, TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070, India


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 124
Abstract HTML Views: 20
PDF Downloads: 27
Total Views/Downloads: 171
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 79
Abstract HTML Views: 17
PDF Downloads: 19
Total Views/Downloads: 115



Creative Commons License
© 2021 Ramakrishnan Sitaraman

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Biotechnology, TERI School of Advanced Studies, 10 Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, 110070, India; Tel: 91-11-71800222; Fax: 91-11-2612874;
E-mail: minraj@gmail.com


Abstract

In this perspective article, we suggest that bacterial quorum-sensing signal molecules (QSSMs) be systematically screened and evaluated for their ability to exert anti-inflammatory activity in the context of COVID-19-associated cytokine storms and other hyper-inflammatory conditions. Rapid and relevant in vitro screening of these and other compounds (natural or synthetic) can be accomplished by a careful choice of assay systems that are relevant to the disease context. Some lines of evidence indicating the utility of using such an approach, its potential benefits and risks during actual usage, as well as avenues for further research, are discussed.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Inflammation, QSSM, Immunomodulation, Anti-inflammatory, COVID-19, Cytokine release syndrome, Pro-inflammatory.



1. INTRODUCTION

The greater clinical severity of a proportion of COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) cases arising from infection with the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2) virus originating from Wuhan, China, is attributable to hyper-inflammatory responses. Hyperinflammation is characterized by the increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, a phenomenon that is termed “cytokine storm” or “cytokine release syndrome” (recently reviewed by Fajgenbaum and June) [1]. While different viral infections, including corona and influenza viruses, may elicit cytokine storms, a systematic review of human patient data by Olbei et al. (2021) determined that the precise profile of inflammatory and non-inflammatory cytokines consistently induced or repressed is dependent on the infecting virus. Specifically, general increases in the levels of the cytokines IL-18, CXCL10, and IL-6 (pro-inflammatory) and IL-1RA (anti-inflammatory) were observed. Key anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and IL-2 exhibited mixed trends, while IL-4 exhibited no increase [2]. Therapeutic strategies proposed or tested to minimize tissue damage during COVID-19-induced cytokine storms have focused on the administration of drugs (notably steroids) that have a general anti-inflammatory effect or target specific cytokines [1, 3].

Prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) colonising multicellular organisms (including humans) as commensals, pathogens, or mutualists have evolved various strategies to modulate the host’s immune defenses, whether innate or adaptive and thereby persist for extended lengths of time within the host. One functional class of molecules secreted by prokaryotes are Quorum-Sensing Signal Molecules (QSSMs), whose concentration in the environment serves as a proxy for cell numbers for microbes of a given species or even across species. This is analogous to stipulating a ‘quorum’ wherein collective decisions require the presence and affirmation of a minimum number of individuals to be legally valid, hence the name. Microbes of the same or different species respond physiologically to concentrations of QSSMs above a certain threshold. The best-studied of these molecules are either oligopeptides (produced by Gram-positive bacteria) or acyl-homoserine lactones (produced by Gram-negative bacteria, generically termed autoinducer – 1 (AI-1)) or autoinducer – 2 (AI-2, produced by both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria). Other notable categories of molecules known to serve as QSSMs are alkyl 4-quinolones, diffusible signal factors (fatty acids), and diketopiperazines. It is notable that the sensing of microbial QSSMs and mounting physiological responses to them occur not only within and across species but also across kingdoms [4, 5].

I suggest that microbe-derived non-peptide QSSMs, particularly those derived from bacteria (or other microbes) that establish a chronic infection, be screened as potential anti-inflammatory agents. Current strategies to suppress cytokine storms have not taken this class of molecules into serious consideration. Additionally, most translational research on QSSMs focuses on controlling and eliminating bacterial (and fungal) infections by disrupting key QSSMs (“quorum quenching”) elaborated by the pathogen, as is evident from reviews of patents granted in the field [6-8]. However, it might be equally beneficial to examine the immunomodulatory effects of QSSMs in the context of dampening inflammatory responses and determine whether some of these molecules could supplement or substitute for currently used steroids such as dexamethasone that are often accompanied by undesirable side-effects [9].

2. ANTI-INFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF QSSMs

There are relatively few reports in the literature regarding the specifically immunosuppressive effects of QSSMs, as most studies are conducted in the context of infectious diseases wherein inflammation to eliminate the pathogen is the actual and/or desired readout. Bandyopadhaya et al. (2016) demonstrated that 2-acetoamenophenone (2-AA) produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced a tolerant state in human and murine cell lines (THP-1 monocytes and RAW264.7 macrophages, respectively) wherein pre-exposure attenuated induction of TNF-α, IL-1β, and MCP-1. A similar effect was seen when primary human and murine macrophages were studied. This outcome was found to be mediated epigenetically via induction of histone demethylation of target genes by the histone deacetylase HDAC1, but the signalling cascade that leads to this effect is unknown. Most tellingly, pre-treatment of mice with 2-AA followed by a burn-P. aeruginosa infection protocol improved survival outcomes post-infection, which benefit was abrogated on the administration of the specific HDAC1 inhibitor trichostatin A [10]. Similarly, N-(3-oxododecanoyl) homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C12-HSL) from P. aeruginosa was found to reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ, while concomitantly elevating the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-4 in a (human-derived) mixed lymphocyte dendritic cell (MLDR) reaction [11]. TNF-α production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells after bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation was attenuated by the application of increasing concentrations of 3-oxo-C12-HSL [12]. More interestingly, 3-oxo-C12-HSL was also found to increase the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells [13]. Synthetic analogues of 3-oxo-C12-HSL have also been tested for anti-inflammatory effects on Caco-2 and RAW264.7 cell lines, with promising results showing a reduction in IL-6 and IL-8 in pre-stimulated cells [14]. Finally, Okamoto et al. (2012) determined using the human intestinal cell line Caco2/bbe that application of the Bacillus subtilis QSSM competence and sporulation factor (a peptide) resulted in the induction of IL-10 (an anti-inflammatory cytokine) and reduced the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6, CXCL-1 and IL-4 [15]. Studies in mice have also indicated that QSSMs can exert immunosuppressive effects in the context of type I diabetes [16, 17], which is an autoimmune disorder.

3. MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS INTO THE MODE OF ACTION OF QSSMs

The molecular mechanisms by which QSSMs exert the observed effects on eukaryotic cells are only beginning to be unravelled. The family of G-protein coupled bitter taste receptors (T2Rs or Tas2Rs) have been found to be involved in innate immunity in extra-oral tissues, including respiratory tissues [18, 19]. For example, acyl-homoserine lactones secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bind to T2R38 [20, 21] which, in turn, activates a G-protein-mediated signalling cascade that activates the phospholipase C isoform β2 (PLCβ2), resulting in the production of the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). IP3 induces Ca2+ release from the intracellular store, and the cascade culminates in bactericidal levels of NO production [22]. Pundir et al. (2019) determined that the human mast cell-specific G-protein coupled receptor MRGPRX2 could be activated by peptide QSSMs from Gram-positive bacteria, leading to mast cell degranulation and release of reactive oxygen species, TNF-α and prostaglandin D2 [23]. Note, however, that these are instances of essentially pro-inflammatory responses.

A recent study of the cytoplasmic aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhRs or AHRs) has indicated that they are able to sense QSSMs during bacterial infections and determine immunological outcomes. Most importantly, it was discovered that N-(3-oxodecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone and 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline from PA could inhibit AhR activation by 1-hydroxyphenazine (a virulence factor produced by PA) in cell lines with no appreciable loss of cell viability. More interestingly, AhR activation in vivo in zebrafish and mice is tuned to the growth phase of PA, with host defenses being activated only at high bacterial densities, indicating active sensing of QSSM levels [24]. AhRs belong to the superfamily of basic-helix–loop–helix/PER–ARNT–SIM (PAS) transcription factors and are expressed in various tissues, including lungs. Inactive AhR resides in the cytoplasm bound to chaperones such as Hsp90. Upon binding to a suitable ligand that could be one of several types of synthetic as well as naturally occurring molecules such as pollutants, toxins, bacterial metabolites, etc., it undergoes a conformational change, dissociates from the bound chaperones, and translocates to the nucleus. Within the nucleus, it forms a complex with the AHR nuclear translocator (AHRNT); this complex can bind DNA and induce or inhibit several target genes. Among those genes induced is the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 [25]. Recently, it was found that SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in increased mucus secretion (and eventually hypoxia) due to increased activation of AhR as a result of the interferon response, which is the normal innate immune response to viral infection [26]. Furthermore, murine coronavirus can directly activate AhR bypassing cellular controls [27]. Therefore, given the critical role of AhR activation in precipitating inflammatory states, downregulation of AhR has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy [28], and the potential of bacterial QSSMs to do so could be explored in greater detail.

CONCLUSION

Given the foregoing account, it is evident that suitable mammalian/human immune primary cells and cell lines can be experimentally stimulated to produce cytokines such as IL-6 [29], IL-18 [30], and CXCL10 [31] that seem to be elevated in SARS-CoV-2 infections [2]. In vitro cytokine assays can be used to evaluate the ability of QSSMs to lower levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and/or elevate levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines. Such assays could also be used to test QSSMs for the ability to render cells refractory to immune hyper-stimulation upon subsequent exposure to pyrogenic molecules such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). This screening method may be used to test QSSMs for their immunosuppressive capabilities in COVID-19 as well as other inflammatory diseases if enough a priori information on the relevant cytokines and cell/tissue types to be targeted is available [31].

To sum up, receptors for bacterial QSSMs exist on human cells that can, in principle, be modulated by QSSMs to induce pro- or anti-inflammatory states. More specifically, QSSMs could be screened for their ability to target AhR (see the previous section) and exert an antagonistic anti-inflammatory during COVID-19, which could then form the basis of future therapeutic strategies. As a receptor class that binds to diverse types of compounds ranging from xenobiotics to bacterial metabolites, AhR is a suitable target for anti-inflammatory intervention. The availability of databases of both non-peptide [32] and peptide [33] QSSMs can inform efforts to systematically screen QSSMs for specific physiological effects, including, but not limited to, the inhibition of inflammatory processes. One advantage of using non-peptide QSSMs would be that similar molecules are produced by the resident microbiota, potentially minimizing the chances of adverse side-effects or of developing allergies. A collateral benefit of using non-peptide QSSMs to mitigate cytokine storms is that their likely low antigenicity considerably reduces the risk of adverse immune reactions after subsequent administrations of the same molecule. It is notable that the P. aeruginosa QSSM N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone conjugated to bovine serum albumin was found to elicit protective antibodies in one study on mice [34]. But the requirement for conjugation to a protein underscores its intrinsically low antigenicity. It has also been suggested that the ability of probiotics to alleviate COVID-19 symptoms by reducing inflammation could be examined [35]. However, introducing large numbers of live organisms into patients already suffering extreme immune dysfunction exemplified by cytokine storms raises serious safety concerns. Furthermore, probiotics can serve as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance determinants and can occasionally result in opportunistic infections [36]. The strategy of testing QSSMs proposed here can be extended to screen any molecule, whether natural or synthetic, for anti-inflammatory activity in a variety of disease contexts, provided an appropriate assay system is available. This would facilitate the identification and isolation of specific immunomodulatory molecules elaborated by probiotics and would obviate the need to administer live organisms.

All the same, it must be borne in mind that the same QSSM can have different effects on different host cell types [37, 38]. A therapeutic strategy would need to consider the key cell types influencing clinical outcomes in the organ(s) most affected. Furthermore, the presence of lactonases among the resident microbiota and the production of paraoxonases by the human (mammalian) host might limit the persistence time of such molecules within the system, complicating the determination of an appropriate dosing regimen. Strategies to deliver the QSSMs to the affected site would also have to be devised depending on the site location. A concomitant concern would be the effect of such microbial signaling molecules on the resident microbiota and whether such administration could trigger a problematic dysbiosis or an increase in opportunistic bacterial infections. In conclusion, QSSMs (or their synthetic derivatives) in isolation or combination with more conventional anti-inflammatory agents could potentially help reduce or eliminate unpleasant side effects associated with current therapies.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

COVID-19 = Coronavirus Disease 2019
SARS-CoV-2 = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
QSSM = Quorum-Sensing Signal Molecule
LPS = Lipopolysaccharide
AhR/AHR = Aryl hydrocarbon receptor

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This paper is dedicated to my parents, Mr. G. Sitaraman and Mrs. Indubala, for their unstinting support of my studies and to my uncle Dr. S. Ramachandra Rao. I would like to thank Mr. Ratan Jha, Assistant University Librarian (Head), TERI School of Advanced Studies for expeditiously procuring some of the references used in this article.

REFERENCES

[1] Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine Storm. N Engl J Med 2020; 383(23): 2255-73.
[2] Olbei M, Hautefort I, Modos D, et al. SARS-CoV-2 causes a different cytokine response compared to other cytokine storm-causing respiratory viruses in severely ill patients. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 629193.
[3] Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the ‘Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J Infect 2020; 80(6): 607-13.
[4] Li Q, Ren Y, Fu X. Inter-kingdom signaling between gut microbiota and their host. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 2019; 76(12): 2383-9.
[5] Hartmann A, Schikora A. Quorum sensing of bacteria and trans-kingdom interactions of N-acyl homoserine lactones with eukaryotes. J Chem Ecol 2012; 38(6): 704-13.
[6] Chen X, Zhang L, Zhang M, Liu H, Lu P, Lin K. Quorum sensing inhibitors: A patent review (2014-2018). Expert Opin Ther Pat 2018; 28(12): 849-65.
[7] Jiang T, Li M. Quorum sensing inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2013; 23(7): 867-94.
[8] Pan J, Ren D. Quorum sensing inhibitors: a patent overview. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2009; 19(11): 1581-601.
[9] Sood S, Bhatia GK, Seth P, et al. Efficacy and safety of new and emerging drugs for COVID-19: Favipiravir and dexamethasone. Curr Pharmacol Rep 2021; 7: 49-54.
[10] Bandyopadhaya A, Tsurumi A, Maura D, Jeffrey KL, Rahme LG. A quorum-sensing signal promotes host tolerance training through HDAC1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1(12): 16174.
[11] Boontham P, Robins A, Chandran P, et al. Significant immunomodulatory effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules: Possible link in human sepsis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2008; 115(11): 343-51.
[12] Hooi DSW, Bycroft BW, Chhabra SR, Williams P, Pritchard DI. Differential immune modulatory activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules. Infect Immun 2004; 72(11): 6463-70.
[13] Glucksam-Galnoy Y, Sananes R, Silberstein N, et al. The bacterial quorum-sensing signal molecule N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone reciprocally modulates pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in activated macrophages. J Immunol 2013; 191(1): 337-44.
[14] Peyrottes A, Coquant G, Brot L, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of analogues of N-Acyl homoserine lactones on eukaryotic cells. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21(24): 9448.
[15] Okamoto K, Fujiya M, Nata T, et al. Competence and sporulation factor derived from Bacillus subtilis improves epithelial cell injury in intestinal inflammation via immunomodulation and cytoprotection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27(8): 1039-46.
[16] Gaisford W, Pritchard DI, Cooke A. OdDHL inhibits T cell subset differentiation and delays diabetes onset in NOD mice. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011; 18(8): 1213-20.
[17] Pritchard DI, Todd I, Brown A, et al. Alleviation of insulitis and moderation of diabetes in NOD mice following treatment with a synthetic Pseudomonas aeruginosa signal molecule, N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone. Acta Diabetol 2005; 42(3): 119-22.
[18] Ahmad R, Dalziel JEG. G protein-coupled receptors in taste physiology and pharmacology. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11: 587664.
[19] Patel NN, Workman AD, Cohen NA. Role of taste receptors as sentinels of innate immunity in the upper airway. J Pathogens 2018; 2018 Article ID 9541987
[20] Lee RJ, Chen B, Redding KM, Margolskee RF, Cohen NA. Mouse nasal epithelial innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecules require taste signaling components. Innate Immun 2014; 20(6): 606-17.
[21] Lee RJ, Xiong G, Kofonow JM, et al. T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection. J Clin Invest 2012; 122(11): 4145-59.
[22] Freund JR, Mansfield CJ, Doghramji LJ, et al. Activation of airway epithelial bitter taste receptors by Pseudomonas aeruginosa quinolones modulates calcium, cyclic-AMP, and nitric oxide signaling. J Biol Chem 2018; 293(25): 9824-40.
[23] Pundir P, Liu R, Vasavda C, et al. A connective tissue mast-cell-specific receptor detects bacterial quorum-sensing molecules and mediates antibacterial immunity. Cell Host Microbe 2019; 26(1): 114-122.e8.
[24] Moura-Alves P, Puyskens A, Stinn A, Klemm M, Guhlich-Bornhof U, Dorhoi A, et al. Host monitoring of quorum sensing during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Science 2019; 366(6472): eaaw1629.
[25] Torti MF, Giovannoni F, Quintana FJ, García CC. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a modulator of anti-viral immunity. Front Immunol 2021; 12: 624293.
[26] Liu Y, Lv J, Liu J, et al. Mucus production stimulated by IFN-AhR signaling triggers hypoxia of COVID-19. Cell Res 2020; 30(12): 1078-87.
[27] Grunewald ME, Shaban MG, Mackin SR, Fehr AR, Perlman S. Murine coronavirus infection activates the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in an indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase-independent manner, contributing to cytokine modulation and proviral TCDD-Inducible-PARP expression. J Virol 2020; 94: e01743-19.
[28] Turski WA, Wnorowski A, Turski GN, Turski CA, Turski L. AhR and IDO1 in pathogenesis of COVID-19 and the “Systemic AhR Activation Syndrome:” a translational review and therapeutic perspectives. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2020; 38(4): 343-54.
[29] Beaty CD, Franklin TL, Uehara Y, Wilson CB. Lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production in human monocytes: Role of tyrosine phosphorylation in transmembrane signal transduction. Eur J Immunol 1994; 24(6): 1278-84.
[30] Manigold T, Böcker U, Traber P, et al. Lipopolysaccharide/endotoxin induces IL-18 via CD14 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Cytokine 2000; 12(12): 1788-92.
[31] Bandow K, Kusuyama J, Shamoto M, Kakimoto K, Ohnishi T, Matsuguchi T. LPS-induced chemokine expression in both MyD88-dependent and -independent manners is regulated by Cot/Tpl2-ERK axis in macrophages. FEBS Lett 2012; 586(10): 1540-6.
[32] Rajput A, Kaur K, Kumar M. SigMol: repertoire of quorum sensing signaling molecules in prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44(D1): D634-9.
[33] Wynendaele E, Bronselaer A, Nielandt J, et al. Quorumpeps database: chemical space, microbial origin and functionality of quorum sensing peptides. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41(Database issue): D655-9.
[34] Miyairi S, Tateda K, Fuse ET, et al. Immunization with 3-oxododecanoyl-L-homoserine lactone-protein conjugate protects mice from lethal Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. J Med Microbiol 2006; 55(Pt 10): 1381-7.
[35] Akour A. Probiotics and COVID-19: is there any link? Lett Appl Microbiol 2020; 71(3): 229-34.
[36] Kothari D, Patel S, Kim S-K. Probiotic supplements might not be universally-effective and safe: A review. Biomed Pharmacother 2019; 111: 537-47.
[37] Holban A-M, Bleotu C, Chifiriuc MC, Bezirtzoglou E, Lazar V. Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing (QS) molecules on the viability and cytokine profile of human mesenchymal stem cells. Virulence 2014; 5(2): 303-10.
[38] Thomas GL, Böhner CM, Williams HE, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing small molecule probes on mammalian macrophages. Mol Biosyst 2006; 2(2): 132-7.