Bangalore is the capital city of Karnataka state, where the first COVID-19 case was reported on 8^th March. A self-quarantined, Whitefield-based IT employee who returned from abroad was confirmed to be affected by COVID-19 positive followed by his wife and children. In addition to this, many positive cases were progressively reported in the state. The government planned to reduce the spreading by ordering to stop public gatherings and maintain social distance. It is the only first and foremost method to implement in the public sector to break the chain of spreading virus hence, the government initially announced a three-week lockdown of all the essentials [15].

The first death case due to the coronavirus in Karnataka state was reported in the Kalaburagi district on March 13, 2020. A 76-year-old person who had returned from abroad died due to COVID-19 and the State Health Minister announced it after confirmation. Moreover, this COVID-19 patient suffered from hypertension and asthma disease [16]. The moment when it was announced publically by the government, the whole state was under a lot of fear about the coronavirus. Many negative thoughts started to spread in the form of discussions in public. Thinking of the wellbeing of the society, the government considered this very seriously and planned different measures to control the viral spreading.

By March 2020, the corona virus had started spreading in our country, but before 12^th March, there were no death cases reported. After a death due to COVID-19, the government considered implementing a serious lockdown for its control. Hence, four lockdown systems were implemented very strictly for 68 days (Fig. 1). Details of the lockdown phases are given in the Table 1.

Immediately after the report of the first death case due to COVID-19 in Karnataka, the government announced a lockdown to maintain social distancing, which is one of the preventive measures of COVID-19. Under the Epidemic Diseases Act, the central government and the state government announced and implemented a lockdown strategy from March 25, 2020, to April 14, 2020, for 21 days and called this the first lockdown. This was implemented to avoid the spreading of the virus with multiple growths in human cells. Therefore, it was considered very seriously because of the non-availability of suitable medicines. In fact, the available medication in the market could neither control the viral spread nor treat the disease. Hence, the lockdown was the only implementing method on publics to stop the multiplication of the virus up to a considerable extent. Then, all the public activities in the state were completely suspended to maintain social distancing. Directives were issued to close all the public places with high footfall like malls, universities, colleges, cinema theatres, clubs, marriages, conferences, and mass gatherings, as a precautionary measure. All the state borders and district border transportations were completely shut down and sealed with curfew-like restrictions. The transports like KSRTC, BMTC, cab services, metro service, and national and international airway transportations were suspended to avoid mass gatherings. However, one of the essential services medical service was continued for the public, even when many cases were detected during the lockdown. After implementing preventive measures, the number of cases increased at a slower rate and was under control [17]. Some of the initially detected positive cases with details are given in Table 2. The slow growth rate of COVID-19 cases that was initially detected with travel history is also clearly revealed in Table 2.

In addition to this, the number of cases detected and death cases during the first lockdown was surveyed thoroughly and the data is given in Table 3. The three-dimensional bar graph representing the detected cases and death cases during the first lockdown is shown in Fig. (2). This table clearly shows the cumulative increase in the detection of positive cases and an increase in the death cases along with the days. It also shows the slow spreading of the virus in the state with a cumulative increase in death cases. At the end of the first lockdown, a total of 91 new coronavirus cases and 11 death cases were detected within 21 days. This forced the government to take strict action against the virus control and implemented the second lockdown system to control the virus spread.

In connection with the increase in positive cases and death cases during the first lockdown, the government decided to implement the second lockdown with some more rigorous rules and regulations to control the virus in a better and more effective manner. Hence, the government announced a second lockdown from April 15, 2020, to May 3, 2020. Number of reported cumulative cases and death cases during second lock down are given in Table 4. An increase in the number of positive cases forced the government to extend the first lockdown period and it was called the second lockdown. During this lockdown period, the central government announced a fresh set of guidelines to be observed by all states and the same guidelines were implemented in Karnataka state (Fig. 3). Some of the essential strategies followed during that time are given below:

● All places of social gatherings, including religious conventions, were barred.

● Most of the Agricultural activities were exempted and allowed to be operated.

● All the Public work programs linked with the employment of daily-wage-labours with social-distancing measures were also exempted and allowed to be operated [18].

With the spike in viral cases, the government of Karnataka further extended lockdown till May 17 by following the central government direction. The government made three zones, namely, the red zone, orange zone, and green zone, following the number of cases detected in the specific places. Red zones were those with high coronavirus cases detected and a high doubling rate, orange zones were those with comparatively lesser cases, and green zones were those without any cases detected during the previous 21 days. The public movement on road transport was allowed in green zones with limited 50% capacity, i.e., single sitting arrangement with precautions. In orange zones, only private and hired vehicles were allowed, but public movement and other transportation were restricted (Fig. 4). The red zones remained under complete lockdown, similar to earlier stages [19]. Number of reported cumulative cases and death cases during second lock down are given in Table 5.

On May 18, 2020, the chief minister of Karnataka announced the continuation of lockdown in the state up to May 31, 2020, with some relaxation after receiving the central government's guidelines. During this phase of the lockdown, most of the activities, excluding malls, theatres, and hotels, were permitted to operate between morning 7 and evening 7, except on Sundays. To restrict the activities on Sundays, the government had decided to implement a lockdown every Sunday, during this period the public activities were restricted [20]. The numbers of new cumulative cases detected and death cases have been tabulated in Table 6. The three-dimensional bar graph representing the detected cases and death cases during the third lockdown is shown in Fig. (5). This table and the figure show again a rapid increase in the positive virus cases along with an increase in death rate as well. During these 14 days, 2538 cumulative positive cases were recorded, with 51 death cases.

The lockdown phases which were implemented in Karnataka are given in the Table 1 in the experimental section and the time tine graph of the lockdown system is represented in Fig. (1). The graphical figure represents the four lockdown phases with a number of days and represents the decrease in the number of days during the successive lockdown. Step-wise implementation of lockdown took place and also reduced the days, which may be due to the expectation of reduction of positive cases throughout the state. After implementing preventive measures, the number of cases increased at a slower rate and was under control [17]. During the first lockdown, initially detected positive cases with details have been given in Table 2 in the experimental section. The slow rate of COVID-19 cases was initially detected with travel history is vivid from Table 2. In addition to this, one can observe from the table that the first case was detected from IT employees who returned from abroad. The latter case also showed that again, an IT employee with his wife as well as his children. The increase of positive cases continued with an older adult who returned from abroad followed by again an IT employee and added to the cumulative number of positive cases. These results show that the viral infection started in the state from the people who returned from abroad. The number of new cases and death cases during the first lockdown has been tabulated in Table 3. The three-dimensional bar graph representing the detected cases and death cases during the first lockdown is shown in Fig. (2). This figure shows the cumulative increase in detection of positive cases and an increase in death cases along with the days. It also shows the slow spreading of the virus in the state with a cumulativeincrease in death cases. At the end of the first lockdown, a total of 91 new coronavirus cases and 11 death cases were detected within 21 days. This forced the government to take strict action against the virus control and hence implemented the secondlockdown system to control the virus spread.

The number of cumulative cases detected with the number of death cases during the second lockdown period is given in Table 4 in the experimental section. The two-dimensional bar graph representing the detected cases and death cases during the second lockdown is shown in Fig. (3). These data reveal an increase in the number of new patients as well as death cases. During these 19 days of lockdown, 341 cumulative new patients and 26 cumulative death cases were detected. This data, when compared with the first lockdown data, confirms the progressive increase in detecting new positive cases and new death cases in the second lockdown as well. However, based on the guidelines issued by the central government, the chief minister of Karnataka announced the decision on relaxation on April 20^th after evaluating the extent of public conformity to the lockdown [18].

The positive cases and related deaths observed during this period and the data available are given in the Table 5 in the experimental section. The two-dimensional bar graph representations of detected cases and death cases during the third lockdown are shown in Fig. (4). Similar to the earlier lockdown, during this period also, the number of new cases and death cases was increasing. During these 14 days, a total of 647 cumulative new cases were detected, with cumulative 37 death cases. The zones classification was revised once a week [19].

Fig. (1). Two-dimensional graph representing the timeline of lockdown in Karnataka state.

Fig. (2). Two-dimensional bar graph representing several cases detected and death cases during the first lockdown.

Fig. (3). Two-dimensional bar graph representing the number of cases detected and death cases during the second lockdown.

Fig. (4). Two-dimensional bar graph representing the number of cases detected and death cases during the third lockdown.

The number of new cumulative cases detected and death cases are tabulated in Table 6 in the experimental section. The two-dimensional bar graph representations of the detected cases and the death cases during the third lockdown are shown in Fig. (5). This table and figure show again a rapid increase in the positive virus cases along with an increase in the death rate also. During these 14 days, 2538 cumulative positive cases were recorded, with 51 death cases [20].

The comparative study of these four lockdown phases gives precise information about the variation in the reported cases and death cases. Table 7 shows the comparative reported cases and death cases in all four lockdown phases. Fig. (6) represents the two-dimensional bar graph of positive cases and death cases during this lockdown. It is observed from the table and figure that, during the first lockdown, the slow increase of the number of positive patients and prolonged increase of death cases, whereas in the second lockdown, progressive increase of the cases with a moderate increase of the death cases have been reported. Mutation of the virus took place even after the consideration of precautionary measures like social distancing and using the mask. During the first fourteen days of the third lockdown a further increase in the positive and death cases was observed. The death cases that crossed more than 37 hindered the implementation of strict disciplinary actions in controlling public activities. Multiplication of these controlling forces continued by the government and continued the lockdown system to reduce the number of multiple cases. But, during the fourth lockdown phase, the sudden increase in the new cases with an increase in death cases was observed. Moreover, these reports confused the public whether the virus spreads over community bases or it is still under control. Number of quarantines was increasing day by day; out of that some were under death cases and some were curable with available medication.

Fig. (5). Two-dimensional bar graph representing the number of cases detected and death cases during the fourth lockdown.

Fig. (6). Two-dimensional bar graph representing the comparative lockdown data.

Soon after the first death case, and observing the virus spread in India, on March 22, 2020, Sunday, the Hon'ble Prime Minister, Sri. Narendra Modi ji requested the fellow citizens to maintain social distance by staying at home for an entire day and he called it as JANATA CURFEW. It was a self-imposed restriction for society's well-being and was the first action to fight against the coronavirus in our country. The Janata Curfew was made successful by the public, who with due respect to the prime minister's words, stayed indoors and exhibited their support to fight this virus [21].

With the implementation of lockdown in the state to maintain social distancing, all financial activities were crippled and impacted the financial conditions of the state. Hence, the government of Karnataka called upon its citizens to financially contribute and lend a helping hand to fight against COVID-19 and called it as Chief Minister Relief Fund. The corporate sectors initially contributed Rs. 510 Million, Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA) contributed Rs. 5.1 Millions and BCCI contributed Rs. 5.1 Millions to the CM relief fund for fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. Toyota Company added the same by distributing 1000 essential kits to daily wage workers, which benefitted over 5000 families, and distributed free-of-cost sanitizers and masks to the Police Department. The transportation department provided their buses to facilitate the state health department. The authority of Toyota Kirloskar Motor also donated Rs. 20 Millions to the state relief fund. Similarly, many donors (like government employees, NGO’s, politicians, etc.) donated to the state relief fund and they are noted for society's noble cause [22]. This kind of donation at the needy time helped the government to serve the needy people in a better way during this pandemic situation.

The whole world was in trouble due to the corona pandemic, and the countries all over the world were struggling a lot to find some medicine or vaccine at the earliest to help the lives on the earth. To date, no country has discovered suitable medicine to cure exactly this disease. Most of the countries have passed in preliminary results and have been moving towards secondary findings. Some countries like the US and Israel have cleared the second stage expecting good results. However, it was, almost inevitably, less successful in older people because of aged immune systems, which could not respond well to immunization. We can see this with the annual flu jab. In fact, the possibility to overcome this could be by either giving multiple doses or giving it alongside a chemical that gives the immune system a boost.

Following are some of the points which have to be carried out for the same.

● Many trials are required for safe medicine, and it must be free from side effects.

● Proper experimentation is needed for the medicine or vaccine to provoke an immune response, protecting people from getting sick.

● The success of the medication depends on trial experiments on humans.

● After the successful discovery of the medicine, it must be produced on a large scale to reach everyone.

● Its safety must be confirmed before its use.

● If a vaccine is developed, then there will be a limited supply initially, so it is important to prioritize.

Because of the overwhelming spread of the virus, the most powerful vaccine or medicines are required to break the chain from spreading infections. All over the globe, most scientists have involved themselves in the speedy discovery of effective drugs/vaccines, even though a vaccine fit for humans normally takes years to develop. Presently, many potential vaccines have passed the clinical stages and they have to pass the basic human trial version. Recently, the Italian government has claimed the successful discovery of antibodies for human cells. They also claim that the experimentation was thoroughly carried out and reported the proper neutralization in the body. Hence, these antibodies can block the effect of the virus in human cells. In addition to this, Oxford University has also announced a new vaccine called Elisa Granato which also passed the human trial. The vaccine - ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 developed by the University's Jenner Institute trials the final vaccine [23].

It is a new technology developed for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. This therapy effectively treated the patients by transfusing a blood component from COVID-19 recovered patients. This kind of transfusion develops a passive immune system in the affected patients by producing several antibodies. These antibodies fight against the virus and reduce its effects. Karnataka is one of the states that took part in implementing this therapy for the treatment and showed the nearness in patients' recovery. It is not a medication process, but it shows the effective development in strengthening the human immune system of the human body to fight against viruses and it has been treated as an alternative treatment method. However, later there were some words against the therapy and that the highly infectious disease was at an experimental stage and could cause life-threatening transfusion-related complications [24].

Hydroxychloroquine is a drug used to treat malaria, especially in India. In fact, it has been considered as a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) that is proved effective in regulating immune system function. Further, it has been considered as an antimalarial drug; however, it was found that it could not reduce the menace of malarial infection [25]. It also shows some effective medication properties like antiviral and immune development in the treatment of COVID-19. Some of the countries like the US have started the use of the same before confirming the clinical trials as it was the only available medication. Some of the initial trials reported that this medicine could be effective and competent enough to fight against the virus. Of course, it reduces common symptoms of a virus-like cold, fever, cough, etc. in the infected patients. However, this drug was not advised especially in India, thinking as prolonged usage of the same could result in poisoning [26]. Lately, a declaration from the National Institute of Health (NIH) endorsed against the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Therefore, due to safety concerns and lack of efficacy, an emergency use authorisation for hydroxylcholoroquine was revoked for treatment of COVID-19 patients and the Diseases Society of America also supported it. Moreover, to add to the same, the guidelines panel for the treatment of COVID-19 patients endorsed against the usage of hydroxycholoroquine for the treatment of hospitalised and in non-hospitalised patients [27].

Remdesivir drug introduced by Gilead Sciences was also used to treat Ebola and the disease caused by the coronavirus family. It has also been shown to inhibit replication of other human coronaviruses associated with high morbidity in tissue cultures, including severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-like cold, coughs and fever. Hence, it may be considered as a medicine as well because it gives promising results by the speedy recovery of most symptomatic diseases and develops changes in the human body. In addition to this, the possible recovery rate improves in the affected patients. However, effective antiviral properties have been observed in the drug and hence it may be considered a drug for COVID-19. It is not recommended for those who are suffering from renal symptoms and in children. Further, it is also not advisable for the treatment in pregnant women [28-31]. Karnataka government has issued guidelines for the optimal usage of Remdesivir in the treatment of COVID patients in hospitals. However, it has also been said that Remdesivir's Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) may be considered only in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe disease (who require oxygen supply), and also the patient should have no renal or hepatic dysfunction. Similarly, it was suggested that it should not be used in the treatment of patients who require no oxygen support or they are in-home care settings.

During the second wave of COVID-19, the Department of Health and Family welfare officials had a meeting to discuss this proposal with the Association of Private Hospitals and Nursing Homes. During the meeting, the association members requested the officials that the supply of injection should be through the Karnataka State Drugs Logistics and Warehousing Society.

The COVID-19 spreading rate is in accordance with the age of the persons. As per the microbiologists, the spread rate is high in adults i.e., in the age group of 30-40 years and followed by the age group between 20-30 years due to high contact rate with others. Fig. (7) indicates the age-wise positive cases and Fig. (8) represents the gender-wise reported cases during the lockdown. The observation of Fig. (7) clearly shows that the reported male cases have been higher than female cases. The reason behind this may be the high exposure and contact rate of males with the public. The study of the reported cases indicates that the high death rate is in the aged persons who were above 60 years and maybe it was due to less resistance power. Significantly less spread rate and nil death rate in children i.e., aged below ten years, has been observed, which may be due to high resistance power.

Fig. (7). Age wise positive reported cases during lock down.

Fig. (8). Gender wise reported cases during lockdown.

Finally, the government of India launched two effective vaccines called Covaxin and Covisheld to fight against COVID-19. Presently, the government has not permitted the public to decide on their own as to which vaccine they have to get, however the result of the first phase clearly suggested that both the vaccines after being vaccinated in India were found to be safe and effective. The Bharat Biotech International Limited developed Covaxin in collaboration with the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the National Institute of Virology (NIV). Oxford-AstraZeneca developed Covishield, and was manufactured by the Serum Institute of India (SIT). Lately, due to the spread of the highly effective Delta variant, the makers of both the vaccines started a new study in order to regulate the effectiveness of the third dose of covaxin to be considered as the booster dose. Covaxin has been developed with Whole-Virion Inactivated Vero cell-derived technology, whereas Covishield has been prepared using the viral vector platform technology. After usage, the result showed that the Covishield could be up to 90% effective and Covaxin could be 78-81% effective.

However, both the vaccines have been similar to vaccines made using inactive/modified versions of the virus. These vaccines worked as two-dose vaccines; they were administered weeks apart and injected intramuscularly [32, 33].

The government of Karnataka started vaccination very seriously as per the directions from the government of India to control the COVID-19 in the state. Therefore, district-wise planning was made with many camps to create awareness and educate the people about the effectiveness of the vaccines. After the success of the first dose vaccination, the second phase of COVID-19 vaccination in the state began. It has spread in two phases as of now. In the first phase, 4,09,836 healthcare workers and 86,798 frontline workers were administered the first dose of vaccine across the state with a coverage of 50 percent and 30 percent, respectively. The highest cumulative achievements of Health Care Workers (HCW) and Front-Line Workers (FLW) with 98,449 HCW and 11,683 FLW were administered the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The lowest cumulative achievements of HCWs with 3,962 workers administered the first vaccination dose with the lowest FLWs achievements with only 762 workers. The second phase of the COVID-19 vaccination drive began from March 2021 for those who were above 60 years and those above 45 years with co-morbidities. In order to identify the beneficiaries, the Health Department of Karnataka started a door-to-door survey across the state. In fact, the state government has been showing tremendous progress in countering the menace of COVID-19. As of 29^th September 2021, a total of 55940791 people had successfully received both the doses of vaccine in Karnataka state and they are considered to be fully vaccinated [34]. This kind of vaccination has been found to be of great help in controlling the spreading of the virus and finally to contain it completely.